Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Shining’ at 25 – Heading Back to the Overlook for a More Faithful Adaptation

Published

on

the shining tv series

Not all Stephen King adaptations are created equal, but the author usually keeps his criticisms to himself. The one exception is The Shining; King has been famously vocal, to varying extents over the years, about his issues with Stanley Kubrick’s take on his 1977 novel. King’s constant readers also grapple with the disconnect between the movie and its source material.

For his third published novel, the author penned a tragic, personal story about coming to terms with his alcoholism. The 1980 film — masterful technical achievement though it is —is more of a clinical exercise in dread. King has called it “a big, beautiful Cadillac with no engine inside it.”

So when ABC approached King to do another TV miniseries based on his work following the success of 1994’s The Stand, the author expressed interest in The Shining. To ensure this version was more faithful, King translated his own 447-page novel into a three-part teleplay. The general plot is the same as Kubrick’s — a recovering alcoholic moves into a haunted hotel with his family — but there are several impactful changes along the way.

After Brian De Palma — who, of course, was the first to adapt King with Carrie — passed on helming the project, King reunited with The Stand and Sleepwalkers director Mick Garris. Produced by Warner Bros. Television, the 1997 miniseries was filmed in 72 days on a budget of $21 million. (For the project to move forward, Kubrick was paid $1.5 million, and it was stipulated that King could not disparage the original movie.)

The production was largely filmed on location at The Stanley Hotel in Estes Park, Colorado; the allegedly haunted locale that inspired King to write the novel. Most of the cast and crew resided there during the shoot, and some even reported feeling a paranormal presence. King was present for approximately two thirds of the shoot, during which he was writing The Green Mile.

King’s chief criticism of Kubrick’s The Shining is Jack Torrance’s lack of a character arc; rather than a slow descent from family man to madman, King found Jack Nicholson’s portrayal to be crazy from the start. Many actors approached for the role of Jack — including The Stand lead Gary Sinise — turned it down out of fear of being compared to Nicholson. With pressure mounting, Wings star Steven Weber read for the role and was cast a mere three days before shooting began.

Weber has gone on record saying he did not feel any trepidation; rather, he relished the opportunity to flex his acting chops after being typecast as affable goofballs for so long. The lack of intimidation paid off, as Webber brings the nuance of King’s words to the screen in a way that Nicholson — undeniably iconic as he is — did not.

King has also taken umbrage with Kubrick’s misogynistic take on Jack’s wife, Wendy, played by Shelley Duvall. King affords his version of the character, portrayed by Rebecca De Mornay (Risky Business), more agency rather than relegating her to, as he once eloquently referred to it, a “screaming dishrag.”

Arguably, the only misstep in The Shining TV miniseries’ casting is that of Courtland Mead (The Little Rascals) as the Torrance’s son, Danny, who possesses a form of precognition referred to as the shine. The young actor, who turned 9 during production, is more animated but also more grating than Danny Lloyd’s earlier portrayal.

Casting Melvin Van Peebles (best known as the filmmaker/star behind the landmark blaxploitation film Sweet Sweetback’s Baadasssss Song) as hotel cook Dick Hallorann, on the other hand, was inspired. Like Scatman Crothers before him — albeit with a different fate — he’s the story’s secret weapon, bonding with Danny over their shared gift.

Other notable cast members include Elliott Gould (M*A*S*H) as the Overlook’s general manager, Pat Hingle (Batman) as his right-hand man, Mick’s wife Cynthia Garris as the ghastly woman in room 217 (which earned her a coveted Fangoria cover), Shawnee Smith (Saw) as a waitress, and an uncredited Miguel Ferrer (who starred in The Stand as well as The Night Flier) as the voice of Jack’s abusive father.

In addition to cameos from King (playing an orchestra conductor credited as Gage Creed, sharing his name with the ill-fated boy from Pet Sematary) and Garris, genre luminaries Sam Raimi, Frank Darabont, The Crow scribe David J. Schow, and writer Richard Christian Matheson (who later adapted King in Nightmares & Dreamscapes and Big Driver) make brief appearances.

the shining tv jack

Another significant discrepancy between the novel and Kubrick’s film that King aimed to correct was the ending. “The book is hot, and the movie is cold; the book ends in fire, and the movie in ice,” the author astutely observed. Indeed, the momentous finale in which Jack Nicholson is left to freeze in the hedge maze was written for the movie. The book and miniseries conclude with Jack dying when the Overlook’s boiler explodes, destroying the hotel with him.

Moreover, the hedge maze itself was Kubrick’s creation. The book instead features topiary animals that come to life, but Kubrick smartly recognized that the technology did not yet exist to pull them off satisfactorily. They are restored for Garris’ production; their movements accomplished via a mix of puppetry and early CGI (which, although adequate by 1997 standards, has not aged well). Garris cites the topiaries as the most challenging part of the shoot.

Several more of the most memorable elements from Kubrick’s movie — including the Grady twins, the bleeding elevator, “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy,” Jack’s axe, “Here’s Johnny,” and the distinctive carpet pattern — were of his own making. The ease with which he created iconography speaks to the auteur’s genius, but it also allows Garris’ adaptation to forge a more unique identity.

The pacing lags at times, especially when viewed through the modern lens in which long-form content is tailor-made for binging. But the miniseries format allows for the characters and their motives to be considerably more fleshed out than in Kubrick’s version, which left much to the imagination. Editor Patrick McMahon (A Nightmare on Elm Street, The Stand) reins in the 273 minutes of material.

The influential aesthetics of Kubrick’s film left big shoes to fill; it was a pioneer of both the Steadicam and electronic scores. Shelly Johnson (Captain America: The First Avenger, Jurassic Park III), who Garris calls the best director of photography he’s ever worked with, serves as the miniseries’ cinematographer. While the camerawork isn’t particularly ostentatious, the visuals are appropriately atmospheric. Nicholas Pike‘s (Sleepwalkers, Blood and Bone) score, performed by a 60-piece orchestra, adds a Gothic flavor with a haunting choral motif.

The TV version of The Shining won two Emmy Awards: Outstanding Makeup and Outstanding Sound Editing. The former was accomplished by a team that includes prosthetics by Steve Johnson (Ghostbusters, Species), makeup supervision by future Academy Award winner Bill Corso (Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events, Deadpool), and additional work by Ve Neill (Beetlejuice, Ed Wood) and Joel Harlow (Star Trek, Inception).

The Shining aired on TV between April 27 and May 1, 1997. The initial reaction was largely positive, earning strong ratings (albeit not as high as The Stand), predominantly favorable reviews (including a rare perfect rating from TV Guide), and numerous awards and recognitions. Time has not been entirely kind to the miniseries; in addition to the CGI aging poorly, the critical opinion has shifted over the years, particularly when compared to Kubrick’s opus.

25 years later, The Shining remains one of the most faithful adaptations of King’s work and a fascinating TV companion to Kubrick’s feature film version. Not unlike Gus Van Sant’s shot-for-shot remake of Psycho, the miniseries illustrates both the advantages and disadvantages of an obsequious dedication to source material. With The Stand recently receiving a high-definition restoration, I hope The Shining is granted a similar opportunity to shine; the only way to see it currently is on DVD.

the shining tv miniseries

Books

‘See No Evil’ – WWE’s First Horror Movie Was This 2006 Slasher Starring Kane

Published

on

see no evil

With there being an overlap between wrestling fans and horror fans, it only made sense for WWE Studios to produce See No Evil. And much like The Rock’s Walking Tall and John Cena’s The Marine, this 2006 slasher was designed to jumpstart a popular wrestler’s crossover career; superstar Glenn “Kane” Jacobs stepped out of the ring and into a run-down hotel packed with easy prey. Director Gregory Dark and writer Dan Madigan delivered what the WWE had hoped to be the beginning of “a villain franchise in the vein of Jason, Freddy and Pinhead.” In hindsight, See No Evil and its unpunctual sequel failed to live up to expectations. Regardless of Jacob Goodnight’s inability to reach the heights of horror’s greatest icons, his films are not without their simple slasher pleasures.

See No Evil (previously titled Goodnight and Eye Scream Man) was a last gasp for a dying trend. After all, the Hollywood resurgence of big-screen slashers was on the decline by the mid-2000s. Even so, that first Jacob Goodnight offering is well aware of its genre surroundings: the squalid setting channels the many torturous playgrounds found in the Saw series and other adjacent splatter pics. Also, Gregory Dark’s first major feature — after mainly delivering erotic thrillers and music videos  — borrows the mustardy, filthy and sweaty appearance of Platinum Dunes’ then-current horror output. So, visually speaking, See No Evil fits in quite well with its contemporaries.

Despite its mere  setup — young offenders are picked off one by one as they clean up an old hotel — See No Evil is more ambitious than anticipated. Jacob Goodnight is, more or less, another unstoppable killing machine whose traumatic childhood drives him to torment and murder, but there is a process to his mayhem. In a sense, a purpose. Every new number in Goodnight’s body count is part of a survival ritual with no end in sight. A prior and poorly mended cranial injury, courtesy of Steven Vidler’s character, also influences the antagonist’s brutal streak. As with a lot of other films where a killer’s crimes are religious in nature, Goodnight is viscerally concerned with the act of sin and its meaning. And that signature of plucking out victims’ eyes is his way of protecting his soul.

see no evil

Image: The cast of See No Evil enters the Blackwell Hotel.

Survival is on the mind of just about every character in See No Evil, even before they are thrown into a life-or-death situation. Goodnight is processing his inhumane upbringing in the only way he can, whereas many of his latest victims have committed various crimes in order to get by in life. The details of these offenses, ranging from petty to severe, can be found in the film’s novelization. This more thorough media tie-in, also penned by Madigan, clarified the rap sheets of Christine (Christina Vidal), Kira (Samantha Noble), Michael (Luke Pegler) and their fellow delinquents. Readers are presented a grim history for most everyone, including Vidler’s character, Officer Frank Williams, who lost both an arm and a partner during his first encounter with the God’s Hand Killer all those years ago. The younger cast is most concerned with their immediate wellbeing, but Williams struggles to make peace with past regrets and mistakes.

While the first See No Evil film makes a beeline for its ending, the literary counterpart takes time to flesh out the main characters and expound on scenes (crucial or otherwise). The task requires nearly a third of the book before the inmates and their supervisors even reach the Blackwell Hotel. Yet once they are inside the death trap, the author continues to profile the fodder. Foremost is Christine and Kira’s lock-up romance born out of loyalty and a mutual desire for security against their enemies behind bars. And unlike in the film, their sapphic relationship is confirmed. Meanwhile, Michael’s misogyny and bigotry are unmistakable in the novelization; his racial tension with the story’s one Black character, Tye (Michael J. Pagan), was omitted from the film along with the repeated sexual exploitation of Kira. These written depictions make their on-screen parallels appear relatively upright. That being said, by making certain characters so prickly and repulsive in the novelization, their rare heroic moments have more of an impact.

Madigan’s book offers greater insight into Goodnight’s disturbed mind and harrowing early years. As a boy, his mother regularly doled out barbaric punishments, including pouring boiling water onto his “dangling bits” if he ever “sinned.” The routine maltreatment in which Goodnight endured makes him somewhat sympathetic in the novelization. Also missing from the film is an entire character: a back-alley doctor named Miles Bennell. It was he who patched up Goodnight after Williams’ desperate but well-aimed bullet made contact in the story’s introduction. Over time, this drunkard’s sloppy surgery led to the purulent, maggot-infested head wound that, undoubtedly, impaired the hulking villain’s cognitive functions and fueled his violent delusions.

See No Evil

Image: Dan Madigan’s novelization for See No Evil.

An additional and underlying evil in the novelization, the Blackwell’s original owner, is revealed through random flashbacks. The author described the hotel’s namesake, Langley Blackwell, as a deviant who took sick pleasure in defiling others (personally or vicariously). His vile deeds left a dark stain on the Blackwell, which makes it a perfect home for someone like Jacob Goodnight. This notion is not so apparent in the film, and the tie-in adaptation says it in a roundabout way, but the building is haunted by its past. While literal ghosts do not roam these corridors, Blackwell’s lingering depravity courses through every square inch of this ill-reputed establishment and influences those who stay too long.

The selling point of See No Evil back then was undeniably Kane. However, fans might have been disappointed to see the wrestler in a lurking and taciturn role. The focus on unpleasant, paper-thin “teenagers” probably did not help opinions, either. Nevertheless, the first film is a watchable and, at times, well-made straggler found in the first slasher revival’s death throes. A modest budget made the decent production values possible, and the director’s history with music videos allowed the film a shred of style. For meatier characterization and a harder demonstration of the story’s dog-eat-dog theme, though, the novelization is worth seeking out.

Jen and Sylvia Soska, collectively The Soska Sisters, were put in charge of 2014’s See No Evil 2. This direct continuation arrived just in time for Halloween, which is fitting considering its obvious inspiration. In place of the nearly deserted hospital in Halloween II is an unlucky morgue receiving all the bodies from the Blackwell massacre. Familiar face Danielle Harris played the ostensible final girl, a coroner whose surprise birthday party is crashed by the  resurrected God’s Hand Killer. In an effort to deliver uncomplicated thrills, the Soskas toned down the previous film’s heavy mythos and religious trauma, as well as threw in characters worth rooting for. This sequel, while more straightforward than innovative, pulls no punches and even goes out on a dark note.

The chances of seeing another See No Evil with Kane attached are low, especially now with Glenn Jacobs focusing on a political career. Yet there is no telling if Jacob Goodnight is actually gone, or if he is just playing dead.

See No Evil

Image: Katharine Isabelle and Lee Majdouba’s characters don’t notice Kane’s Jacob Goodnight character is behind them in See No Evil 2.

Continue Reading